Partnerships and co-selling: a case study playbook for fintech
The anatomy of a partnerships and co-selling engagement that worked — what we tried, what we killed, and what we would repeat. Written for heads of growth and revenue at regulated fintech companies.
This edition is written for heads of growth and revenue at regulated fintech companies. In fintech, fintech buyers move under compliance review, and every touch has to survive procurement and infosec, so the way you install partnerships and co-selling has to reflect that reality from day one.
Names removed, numbers preserved. This is a real partnerships and co-selling engagement, reproduced as a playbook. Client had product-market fit, a rev team of eleven, and a stalled pipeline.
Week one: diagnosis. The stated problem was "not enough leads". The actual problem was signing MOUs no one operationalises, which had been masked by inbound velocity that peaked two quarters earlier.
Weeks two to three: rebuild the target list from scratch and re-cut the trigger. Partnerships and co-selling works when one great partner is worth ten marketing hires; the client had drifted away from that first principle.
The binding constraint we see in fintech is almost always access to buyers gated by compliance, not lack of demand. Partnerships and co-selling is only useful in this vertical when it is pointed at that constraint — not at a generic growth number borrowed from another category.
Weeks four to six: live at 20% of previous volume, quality bar raised. Sourced and influenced pipeline from partners moved every week, though absolute numbers stayed modest.
Weeks seven to twelve: ramp. By week ten the number was ahead of the pre-stall baseline. By week twelve it was 40% ahead. Cost per outcome was roughly halved.
What we would repeat: the diagnosis step, the quality bar, and the weekly review. What we would kill sooner: two tools we bought in month one that added noise instead of leverage.
The client's own summary at the end of quarter one: "we thought we needed more of everything; we actually needed less of the wrong things." That is usually the lesson.
Concretely for fintech: one qualified fintech opportunity typically justifies a full quarter of program spend. That is the reason it is worth installing partnerships and co-selling properly rather than half-heartedly across three vendors.
Frequently asked questions
Partnerships · fintech — answered
- Does partnerships and co-selling work for fintech?
- Yes — provided it is aimed at access to buyers gated by compliance, not lack of demand rather than a generic growth number. One qualified fintech opportunity typically justifies a full quarter of program spend.
- How long until the case study company saw results?
- The metric moved in week four; the absolute number caught up around week ten.
- What did the client stop doing?
- Running old tools on autopilot and confusing volume with progress.
- What did the client keep doing?
- The Monday plan, the Friday review, and the weekly sourced and influenced pipeline from partners readout.
- Is this case study repeatable?
- The process is repeatable; the numbers depend on category, team, and starting point.
- What is the fintech specific pitfall with partnerships and co-selling?
- Running the generic playbook without adapting to fintech buyers move under compliance review, and every touch has to survive procurement and infosec. The install has to be vertical-first.
Growth Broker editorial
Filed under partnerships · fintech